| Unfortunately,
it seems that nearly everybody knows nearly everything these
days and that there is a real reticence to explore new ideas
or concepts. It is our goal to bring together, on this website
and within our organization, people who think outside of the
box and who are interested in examining the world in which they
live from a variety of different perspectives.
The material below represent concepts and ideas that are
really worth thinking about. In some cases, the authors will
present unique solutions to a particular problem while in
others, unique concepts will be explored. We will also include
material that presents alternate viewpoints to those typically
held by environmentalists. The reason for doing so is to help
environmental activists better understand the totality of
the issues that they are addressing so that they may become
more effective in developing solutions that will truly work.
We do not necessarily agree with or endorse material that
may be included below. Our purpose is not to promote a particular
agenda but rather to foster creative thinking and stimulate
effective problem solving. It is our desire to have this section
grow into substantial resource for all and ask that if you
have a come across an article or other material that you think
merits consideration, please e-mail it to us and we will post
it for others to consider.
Please recognize that all content is the intellectual property
of the author and that we are merely providing access to existing
resources that are currently publicly accessible. If an author
feels that we are infringing on their copyrights, please e-mail
us and we will remove the links immediately.
Why Bad Beliefs Don’t Die
Have you ever wondered why it is so difficult to change people’s
minds, even when all of the evidence indicates that their
position is flat out wrong? Have you ever felt that you are
one of a precious few that can “see the light”
and that the rest of the world is filled with morons? Have
you ever had the urge to ask someone, “What color is
the sky on your planet?”
This
article by Gregory W. Lester from the Skeptical Inquirer
presents a very interesting hypothesis that suggests that
those who refuse to accept the obvious may be doing so for
reasons other than ignorance. If he is correct, it may then
be possible to develop strategies to more effectively persuade
those with divergent points of view.
|