The
Research on Big Box Retail
There is a growing body of research into the impact of big
boxes on community institutions. Some of the research is academically
based and is suitable for consideration over a wide range
of situations. Three such researchers and their work are highlighted
below.
Other research is more site specific and reflects the findings
of a particular community dealing with a particular proposal.
In general, these studies have been done by paid consultants
and are not readily available. Although any number of web
sites may provide excerpts from such studies, the inability
to review them in their entirety makes utilizing them as a
general reference somewhat risky. This is not to discount
their findings or meant to reflect negatively on the quality
of their work but we would suggest that a community interested
in utilizing their results for their own purpose contact the
author and request the complete document set.
When analyzing the impact of big box retail, it is important
to recognize that different communities may have different
needs and desires. In some cases, a big box retailer may actually
deliver on their promises and provide an economic boom while
in another community the results can be disastrous.
For example, a
study conducted by Michael Hicks, Ph. D. of Marshall University,
found that the opening of Wal-Mart stores in southwestern
West Virginia had positive impacts on jobs, salaries, the
unemployment rate and even resulted in additional retail opportunities.
On the surface, this study conflicts with the common perception
that the opening of big box retail has a negative impact on
the local economic base. However, one must factor in the extremely
low per capita income of the areas studied as well as the
exceedingly high unemployment rates to get a more realistic
picture. Given the very depressed nature of the region studied,
it is quite plausible and not even surprising that Wal-Mart,
now the largest employer in the state with over 5,700 employees
(1999), did in fact provide for both an increase in employment
and an opportunity to increase per capita income.
However, in situations where the economic climate is more
robust than that which was studied by Dr. Hicks, big box retailers
represent a real and substantial threat to the existing economy.
Kenneth E. Stone of Iowa State University has spent years
studying the big box retail and is recognized as one of the
leading researchers in the field. In his 1997 report, The
Impact of the Wal-Mart Phenomenon on Rural Communities
(1997) he says:
" There is strong evidence that rural communities
in the United States have been more adversely impacted by
the discount mass merchandisers (sometimes referred to as
the Wal-Mart phenomenon) than by any other factors in recent
times. Studies in Iowa have shown that some small towns
lose up to 47 percent of their retail trade after 10 years
of Wal-Mart stores nearby.”
Although Stone has focused much of his big box research on Iowa,
it is appears to be that his research is more applicable to
non-distressed areas than is the research done by Hicks. This
is illustrated by the 52% decline in retail resources that occurred
in Taos, New Mexico where the number of retail businesses decreased
from 438 to 231 since Wal-Mart came to town.
Perhaps the most important study on the impact of big boxes
to date, and certainly the most robust, is the 1997 report
entitled "Measuring the Economic and Sociological Impact
of the Mega-Retail Discount Chains on Small Enterprise in
Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities". by Edward B.
Shils, the Director Emeritus of the Wharton Entrepreneurial
Center of The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
The
Shils Report, as it is known, provides a detailed look
into the impact of big box retail and its impact. For anyone
fighting against a big box retailer, this report is essential
reading, even though it is quite lengthy.
Dr. Shils examines the big box issue from a number of different
angles and his views are well documented with substantial
research. In his conclusion he writes:
" In the urban areas, the closing of apparel stores,
drug stores, shoe stores, sportswear stores and hardware
stores has destroyed the economic balance of the enclave
or neighborhood. These stores have been unable to compete
with the mega chains, such as Wal-Mart, Kmart, Target and
others; and jobs have been lost within the enclave and neighborhoods.
A lack of jobs in small family type businesses reduces the
purchasing power of the neighborhood and eventually affects
even the prosperity of regional chains such as Bradlees
and Caldor, both having declared bankruptcy within the past
few years. Moreover, Kmart has recently reported serious
losses which have been noted on Wall Street. Problems have
also been reported at Charming Shoppes and other regional
and national chains.”
|