News Archives

Kid’s Castle Safety Questioned

National Issues Update
Planning Concepts
Resource Management
Sprawl
Transportation Issues
Ecosystems
Zoning and Land Use
How Government Works
Laws You Should Know
Resources and Links
More
Issues concerning the levels and potential health risks associated arsenic leaching from the pressure treated lumber used to build the “Kids Castle”, in Doylestown, Pennsylvania were brought to the public’s attention at a press conference on October 30, 2003. Wipe tests of the structure, one of the largest and most popular in Pennsylvania, were conducted on October 14, 2003 by environmentalist, Linda Lori. The results were analyzed by the Environmental Quality Institute at the University of North Carolina and indicated that high levels of arsenic were present at several locations easily accessible to children.
Ms. Lori stressed that the intent of her tests was simply to stimulate action on the part of Doylestown officials who thus far have seemed unconcerned about the potential hazard. Doylestown Supervisor, Tom Scarbourgh acknowledged that the township was aware of the potential problems from testing in 2000 and had recently applied sealant in response. Mr. Scarbourgh could not provide an answer when questioned as to why no tests had been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment. Ms. Lori’s testing was completed after the sealing operation.

Documents obtained from Doylestown Township also indicated that the testing done in 2000 did not conform with standard practice as no wipe tests appear to have been conducted. Testing was limited to ground samples and cut tests. On the positive side, ground sample results were quite low. However, the use of a cut test is of little value in that all it really does is verify that arsenic is present in the wood, which is to be expected since it was placed there intentionally during manufacture.

Several residents and minority Supervisor Barbara Eisenhardt expressed their dismay over the reluctance of the Board of Supervisors as a whole to address the problem. Frustration was also evident at what is perceived to be the board’s condescending and dismissive attitude toward Ms. Eisenhardt when she has raised the issue in the past. Proposals that the entire structure be wrapped in paper or that the children be given paper towels when they leave the play area were viewed as indicative that the board did not understand and/or did not take the issue seriously.

The ICP would like to commend Ms. Lori for her handling of the issue in an objective, professional manner. Hopefully, her efforts will “encourage” the Doylestown supervisors to do a full and complete study of the safety of “Kids Castle.” Our children deserve nothing less.

For additional information on CCA contamination please see Environmental Health – CCA Issues within our Environmental Resource Center.

For more and continuing information on the Kid’s Castle please visit:
http://doylestownwatchdogs.org/


Land PreservationPlanning ConceptsResource ManagementSprawlTransportation IssuesEcosystemsZoning & Land Use
How Government WorksLaws You Should KnowResources & ContactsMore